Privacy Rights Prevail: Claimant Sets Precedent in Insurance Information Access Dispute

3

The information on this website is general in nature and does not take into account your objectives, financial situation, or needs. Consider seeking personal advice from a licensed adviser before acting on any information.

The claim originates from an incident in January when the traveler's belongings, including a bag, were stolen during an overseas trip. In response, SCTI requested a standard consent from the policyholder to acquire "any further information reasonably required" for their investigations.

The claimant, however, raised privacy concerns and proposed a modified consent form. His version mandated that SCTI summarize any information they intended to retrieve and secure written consent before sharing it with third parties.

Insisting on his privacy, the claimant also declined to share his phone number, preferring to handle communications through email, which SCTI found insufficient for the investigation process.

The insurer argued that under the terms and conditions agreed upon by the policyholder at the time of purchase, such an authorization was necessary to ensure comprehensive investigations without any limitations. SCTI warned they could not advance the claim unless the policyholder complied with their request.

On the contrary, the claimant contended that his modifications wouldn't hinder SCTI's access but would merely control the flow of his personal data. He asserted it was unreasonable for SCTI to gather information without his explicit acknowledgment, citing concerns over what he termed as "easily breachable" information.

The Australian Financial Complaints Authority (AFCA) sided with the claimant, emphasizing the need to balance the claimant’s privacy with the insurer's requirement for a thorough investigation.

AFCA noted that SCTI’s request was quite broad, lacking specificity about the necessity of each piece of information. The authority pointed out SCTI's failure to demonstrate any substantial prejudice caused by limiting authority over the claimant's information.

"While requesting limited authority/ies from the complainant presents a greater administrative and time burden for the insurer, it has not shown that doing so would inhibit its ability to investigate the claim or is otherwise unworkable or particularly onerous," the ombudsman remarked.

The ombudsman further commented, "In the absence of the insurer providing reasons to the contrary, the complainant is entitled to know the parties to whom information is being provided to and sought from, its scope, and the opportunity to consent to each."

Thus, SCTI cannot delay claim assessments on the grounds of incomplete standard authorization forms, obliging them to provide the claimant with forms that recognize his conditions.

AFCA also determined that while the claimant may continue using email for routine communication, he must supply his phone number or relevant phone records if deemed vital to the investigation. This case underlines the evolving dynamics between privacy rights and corporate processes, as reported by Insurance News.

Published:Monday, 25th Nov 2024
Source: Paige Estritori

Please Note: If this information affects you, seek advice from a licensed professional.

Share this news item:

Insurance News

Clear

QBE Insurance Faces Market Challenges with Slower Premium Growth

02 Dec 2025: Paige Estritori

QBE Insurance Group, Australia's largest insurer by market value, recently experienced a significant decline in its share price, reaching a seven-month low. This downturn is primarily attributed to a noticeable slowdown in the company's premium rate growth during the third quarter of fiscal 2025. - read more

Australian Insurers Face Challenges in Risk Preparedness

02 Dec 2025: Paige Estritori

Recent findings from the PwC Insurance Banana Skins Survey have highlighted a concerning trend: Australian insurers are trailing behind their global counterparts in terms of preparedness for emerging risks. This survey, now in its tenth iteration, gathered insights from 698 insurance executives across 42 territories, including 37 from Australia, encompassing leaders from major general, life, and composite insurance organisations. - read more

Allianz Australia Penalised for Misleading Insurance Practices

02 Dec 2025: Paige Estritori

In a significant regulatory development, Allianz Australia and its subsidiary, AWP Australia, have been fined $16.8 million for making false and misleading statements. This penalty underscores the critical importance of transparency and honesty in the insurance industry. - read more

IAG Projects Significant Premium Growth and Profit Increase for FY26

24 Nov 2025: Paige Estritori

Insurance Australia Group (IAG) has announced an optimistic forecast for the financial year 2026, anticipating a 10% increase in gross written premium (GWP) and an insurance profit ranging between $1.55 billion and $1.75 billion. This projection follows a robust performance in FY25, where IAG reported a 4.3% rise in GWP to $17.1 billion and a net profit after tax of $1.36 billion. - read more

Australian General Insurers Report Record 19% Return on Equity in FY25

24 Nov 2025: Paige Estritori

Australia's general insurance industry has reported a 19% return on equity (ROE) for the financial year 2025, marking the highest level in a decade. This significant achievement is detailed in the latest Optima Report by actuarial consultancy Finity, which attributes the strong performance to a combination of favorable factors. - read more

Click for more Insurance News